Skip to main content
Automated test rack with multiple Promira Serial Platforms connected via Ethernet

Running Multiple Promira Platforms in One Test System

GSAS Engineering · · 2 min read

Production test systems frequently need multiple Promira Serial Platforms running simultaneously, one per DUT station, or multiple per station for different protocol requirements. When integrating the Promira with NI LabVIEW and TestStand, intermittent error 8030 from `ps_queue_submit` can occur if the API handles and queue lifecycle are not managed correctly.

Understanding Promira Queues

The Promira API uses a queue-based architecture for I2C and SPI transactions. Rather than executing each command individually (which would incur USB or Ethernet round-trip latency for every transaction), the API accumulates multiple commands into a queue and submits them as a batch:

1. Build the queue: add I2C write, I2C read, SPI transfer, and delay commands.
2. Submit the queue: `ps_queue_submit` sends the entire batch to the Promira hardware for autonomous execution.
3. Collect results: `ps_queue_result` retrieves the outcomes of each command in the queue.

This queue architecture is what enables the Promira’s gap-free SPI streaming at 20 MHz and beyond, by keeping multiple outstanding queues in the Promira’s execution pipeline, the hardware can execute one queue while the host prepares the next, eliminating PC-to-instrument latency from the bus timing.

Root Cause: Concurrent Handle Access

The error PS_APP_PENDING_ASYNC_CMD (code 8030) occurs in two scenarios:

Race condition: Two parallel LabVIEW threads or TestStand sequences access the same Promira handle simultaneously. The Promira API is not thread-safe per handle, if thread A submits a queue while thread B is still collecting results from a previous queue on the same handle, the API returns error 8030. Uncollected results: If a previous queue’s results were not collected via `ps_queue_result` before submitting a new queue, the Promira reports pending async commands. The queue is not automatically cleared after execution.

The Fix

For race conditions: Add a 10–20 ms delay between consecutive transactions on the same handle, or use a mutex/semaphore in LabVIEW to serialize access to each Promira handle. Each physical Promira should have exactly one thread accessing its handle at any time. For uncollected results: Always call `ps_queue_result` after every `ps_queue_submit` before building and submitting the next queue. The pattern should be: build → submit → collect → build → submit → collect. For maximum throughput: Create multiple queues and submit them rapidly, the Promira hardware can hold several outstanding queues in its execution pipeline and execute them autonomously without PC intervention. This is how 20 MHz gapless SPI streaming is achieved: the host fills the pipeline faster than the Promira drains it.

Multi-Promira LabVIEW Architecture

When running N Promira platforms in a single TestStand system:

  • Open each Promira with its own handle (`ps_open` returns a unique handle per device).
  • Assign each handle to its own LabVIEW worker thread or TestStand socket.
  • Never share a handle between threads, each handle is a private resource.
  • Use the Promira’s serial number or Ethernet IP address to consistently identify which handle maps to which DUT station.

The Promira’s Gigabit Ethernet interface is particularly valuable in multi-unit test systems because it eliminates USB hub reliability issues and enables placement of each Promira directly at its test station with a standard Ethernet cable run.

GSAS Support

GSAS Micro Systems provides applications engineering support for multi-Promira test system integration, including LabVIEW VI architecture guidance, TestStand sequence design, and Ethernet networking configuration for production floor deployments across India.

Interested in Total Phase tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Embedded engineering workstation in India, illustrating the debug, analysis and design steps where AI now runs inside the process, supported by GSAS
Industry Insights

AI Inside the Engineering Process: What Is Worth Automating, and What Still Needs an Engineer

Arm, SEGGER, Perforce and Siemens EDA have each put AI inside a step of the engineering process rather than on top of it: debug, remediation, design entry, inference on the part. GSAS sets out the position behind our coverage of each: which steps are now worth automating, and which keep a human because the cost of being wrong is a recall.

21 Sept 2026 · 11 min read
Embedded engineering bench in India, illustrating the hardware a developer can act on today, supported by GSAS
Technical Guides Arm

Arm's Agentic AI Push: What Indian Embedded Teams Can Actually Use Today

Arm has set out its platform strategy for the agentic era, putting inference everywhere it has compute. Indian embedded teams can start on that direction this quarter with the Cortex-M toolchain they already own: Helium, CMSIS-NN, Ethos-U and Vela, on boards you can order today.

13 Sept 2026 · 7 min read
The bench to harness adapter path drawn left to right: the ECU connector, a test lead, a media converter or pluggable T1 module, RJ45, and the host, showing where each connector family sits between the device under test and the laptop, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

Automotive Ethernet Connectors: H-MTD, MATEnet, MQS

An ECU arrives on the bench with a connector nobody has a mate for, and the day is gone. Search the family names and you get connector product pages that describe their own part and stop there. This article puts the families side by side in one table using only what their public pages state, then makes the point those pages leave out: the IEEE link segment definition, not the connector, is what sets reach and loss limits, and shielding is a channel decision rather than a preference. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 12 min read