Skip to main content
FADOS MUX 100-Channel multiplexer connected to a test fixture for production PCB testing

FADOS MUX in Production: Setting Up 100-Channel Automated Board Testing

GSAS Engineering · · 8 min read

From Bench Diagnostic to Production Test Station

The FADOS MUX transforms the FADOS VI curve tracer from a manual bench tool into an automated production test system. Where a technician manually probing a board might test 30–50 points in 20 minutes, the MUX scans up to 100 test points in under 60 seconds, comparing every point against a golden reference and generating a pass/fail report without human interpretation.

For Indian EMS (Electronics Manufacturing Services) facilities handling incoming inspection, end-of-line testing, or depot-level repair verification, this automation directly addresses two persistent challenges: testing throughput and operator skill dependency.

System Architecture

A complete FADOS MUX test station consists of:

  • FADOS 9F1 or 7F1: the VI curve tracing engine (FADOS 9F1 or FADOS 7F1)
  • FADOS MUX module: 100-Channel relay multiplexer with multi-way connector interface
  • Test fixture: custom bed-of-nails or pogo-pin fixture matched to the board under test
  • FADOS software: controls the MUX, stores golden references, runs automated comparison, generates reports

The MUX connects to the FADOS unit via a standard interface cable and to the test fixture via a 96-pin connector. The FADOS software treats the MUX as a channel expander, each of the 100 channels is sequentially connected to the VI curve tracing circuit, measured, and compared against the stored reference.

Phase 1: Fixture Design

The test fixture is the mechanical interface between the MUX and the board under test. Each pogo pin or test probe in the fixture maps to one of the MUX’s 100 channels.

Selecting Test Points

Not every component on the board needs a dedicated test point. Prioritize:

  • Power rails: VCC, GND, and intermediate voltage rails at multiple locations
  • High-value components: processors, FPGAs, memory ICs, power regulators
  • Known failure points: components with historically higher failure rates
  • Connector pins: interface connectors where assembly defects are common
  • Decoupling capacitors: these fail frequently and are easy to test via VI signature

For a typical automotive ECU with 400–600 components, 60–80 strategically placed test points provide coverage sufficient to catch the majority of manufacturing defects.

Fixture Construction

Most production fixtures use spring-loaded pogo pins mounted in a machined alignment plate. The board sits on registration pins that ensure repeatable positioning. Vacuum hold-down or mechanical clamps keep the board stable during testing.

For lower-volume applications, hand-wired fixtures with individual probes can be built faster and at lower cost, though they sacrifice the repeatability and speed of a precision-machined fixture.

Phase 2: Golden Board Learning

The golden board learning process creates the reference database against which all subsequent boards are compared.

Procedure

  1. Select a known-good board: ideally from a production batch that has passed functional testing
  2. Mount the board in the fixture: verify all pogo pins make clean contact
  3. Run the learning sequence: the FADOS software cycles through all 100 channels, recording the VI curve signature at each point
  4. Repeat with 3–5 additional known-good boards: multiple samples establish the normal variation range for each test point
  5. Set tolerance bands: the software calculates mean signatures and allows the operator to define acceptable deviation thresholds per channel

Tolerance Tuning

Tolerance settings require engineering judgment. Passive components (resistors, capacitors) typically show tight VI signature clustering across boards and can use narrow tolerance bands. Semiconductor junctions (transistors, diodes, ICs) may show wider variation and need broader tolerance bands to avoid false failures.

The FADOS software provides per-channel tolerance adjustment, so the operator can tighten tolerances on critical test points while relaxing them on components with inherent variation.

Phase 3: Production Testing

With the fixture built and golden reference established, production testing follows a repeatable cycle:

  1. Operator loads board into fixture (5–10 seconds)
  2. Operator presses “Test” in FADOS software (1 second)
  3. MUX scans all 100 channels (30–60 seconds depending on configuration)
  4. Software generates pass/fail report (instant)
  5. Operator removes board and sorts pass/fail (5–10 seconds)

Total cycle time per board: approximately 45–90 seconds. Compare this to 20–40 minutes for manual VI probing of equivalent coverage.

Report Output

The FADOS software generates a test report for each board containing:

  • Pass/fail status per channel
  • VI curve overlay (measured vs. reference) for each failed channel
  • Deviation magnitude for each failure
  • Timestamp and operator ID

These reports provide traceability documentation for ISO 9001 quality systems and can be exported for integration with MES (Manufacturing Execution System) databases.

Phase 4: Ongoing Maintenance

Fixture Maintenance

Pogo pins wear over time. Plan for pin replacement based on test volume, typical spring-loaded pogo pins are rated for 100,000–500,000 cycles. Monitor first-pass yield trends; a gradual increase in false failures often indicates worn or contaminated probe tips.

Reference Updates

When the board design changes (ECO revisions), the golden reference must be re-learned. Maintain revision-controlled reference files so the correct reference loads automatically based on board revision markings.

Why Buy FADOS MUX from GSAS

GSAS Micro Systems is an authorized CBT Electronic partner and ODM assembler. Our team in Bengaluru supports fixture design consultation, golden board learning assistance, and tolerance optimization for production deployments.

We support FADOS MUX installations across India, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Delhi NCR, and Visakhapatnam: with on-site commissioning, operator training, and ongoing service.

  • INR invoicing with GST-compliant documentation
  • Fixture design guidance based on board complexity and test coverage targets
  • Training for operators and quality engineers

Request a FADOS MUX quote → · Book a demo →

Interested in CBT Electronic tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

FPGA in the loop verification workflow between Simulink and a Zynq-7000 development board
Technical Guides Digilent

ZedBoard FPGA-in-the-Loop: HDL Verifier vs HDL Coder

Teams asking for FPGA-in-the-Loop on a ZedBoard usually name HDL Coder and SoC Blockset. FIL is actually HDL Verifier. Here is the correct product split, the JTAG versus Ethernet decision, and the 2015-era advice that is still sending Indian teams down the wrong path.

5 Aug 2026 · 9 min read
FADOS MUX test station on an Indian EMS line generating a board test report, GSAS FADOS reporting workflow
FADOS CBT Electronic

FADOS Test Reports and GSAS Agent: Turning Board Test Results into an Auditable Record

A pass or fail on the FADOS screen is not a record. This guide covers what the FADOS test report contains, what GSAS Agent does with it, and how offline, Google Drive and LAN modes put a QR-linked report on the job card for repair shops and EMS lines in India.

4 Aug 2026 · 8 min read
Classification tree and combination table used to design embedded unit test cases in Razorcat's Classification Tree Editor for TESSY, available in India from GSAS Micro Systems
Compliance & Safety Razorcat Automotive & Mobility

Test Case Design with the Classification Tree Method: Deriving Unit Tests You Can Defend in an Audit

Ad-hoc test cases can be perfectly good tests and still fail an audit, because nothing on file records why that particular set was sufficient. The Classification Tree Method derives test cases from the input space instead: identify the test-relevant aspects as classifications, partition each into equivalence classes, then combine leaf classes in a combination table. Razorcat implements CTM in the Classification Tree Editor, available integrated into TESSY or standalone. GSAS Micro Systems is the authorized Razorcat engineering partner for India, the UAE and Sri Lanka.

1 Aug 2026 · 10 min read