Skip to main content
Electric vehicle simulation workflow covering NVH, battery, dynamics, and thermal analysis

EV Development in India Demands Simulation-First Engineering: Here Is What That Means

GSAS Editorial · · 5 min read

India’s electric vehicle market is not a future possibility, it is a present reality. Electric two-wheelers are approaching double-digit market share in monthly sales. Multiple Indian OEMs have announced electric passenger vehicle platforms.

Electric bus deployment is accelerating in major cities. The development timelines for these vehicles are compressed, Indian OEMs are attempting to bring EVs to market in 24-36 months, compared to the 48-60 month timelines typical of ICE vehicle programmes.

This compression is possible only with simulation-first engineering, where critical design decisions are validated virtually before physical prototypes are built. The alternative, a prototype-test-fix cycle, takes too long and costs too much when the battery pack alone represents a significant fraction of the vehicle’s bill of materials.

NVH: The Defining Challenge

The most immediate simulation challenge in EV development is noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH). In an ICE vehicle, combustion noise masks many structural vibrations. Remove the combustion engine, and every structural resonance, gear whine from the reduction drive, inverter switching harmonic, and road-induced vibration becomes audible.

Indian EV teams in Pune and Chennai report that NVH refinement is consuming more development time and budget than initially planned. The simulation response requires:

  • MSC Nastran SOL 103 and SOL 111 for body-in-white modal analysis and frequency response, identifying structural resonances that amplify noise transmission
  • Actran for acoustic simulation, predicting interior cabin sound pressure levels from structural vibration, accounting for trim, seals, and acoustic treatments
  • Adams for driveline NVH, modelling gear mesh excitation, bearing forces, and torsional vibration in the electric drive unit

The Nastran-Actran-Adams coupled workflow provides the multi-domain simulation capability required for EV NVH development.

Battery Pack Structural Safety

The battery pack is the heaviest single component in an EV, positioned low in the vehicle for centre-of-gravity benefit. Structural integrity under crash, road debris impact, and thermal runaway containment is a safety-critical design requirement.

MSC Nastran SOL 700 (explicit dynamics) handles crash-induced battery pack loading, predicting cell deformation, housing integrity, and intrusion resistance. Marc handles the thermal-structural coupling during thermal runaway events, modelling the cell-level thermal reaction and its structural consequences on the pack housing and cooling system.

For Indian OEMs pursuing EV homologation under AIS-038 and AIS-156, simulation of battery pack structural integrity under specified test conditions is part of the development workflow.

Vehicle Dynamics with Heavy Battery Packs

EV architectures place heavy battery packs (200-600 kg) low in the vehicle structure. This changes the dynamics fundamentally:

  • Lower centre of gravity improves roll stability but shifts the handling balance
  • Higher vehicle mass increases braking distances and suspension loads
  • Instant torque delivery creates longitudinal dynamics challenges, traction control, torque vectoring
  • Battery mass distribution influences ride quality and suspension tuning

Adams vehicle dynamics simulation enables Indian EV teams to evaluate suspension geometry, spring-damper tuning, and anti-roll bar sizing for the specific mass distribution of their EV architecture, before building suspension prototypes.

Thermal Management

EV thermal management is a systems engineering challenge: battery pack cooling, motor cooling, power electronics cooling, and cabin HVAC compete for the same thermal budget. Simulation of the coupled thermal system, heat generation in cells and motors, coolant flow distribution, heat exchanger performance, and transient thermal behaviour during fast charging, requires multiphysics capability.

The Cadence simulation portfolio addresses this through Marc’s coupled thermo-mechanical analysis (for battery pack thermal-structural behaviour) and integration with CFD solvers for coolant flow simulation.

Lightweight Structures and Materials

EV range is directly affected by vehicle mass. Lightweighting through advanced materials, aluminium castings, short-fibre reinforced plastics, carbon fibre composites, requires simulation of both the manufacturing process and the structural performance.

Digimat links injection moulding simulation to structural FEA, predicting the as-manufactured strength of reinforced plastic components. MSC Nastran SOL 200 topology optimisation generates weight-optimised structural concepts from design space and loading constraints.

Why Buy from GSAS

GSAS provides the complete Cadence simulation portfolio for Indian EV development teams, MSC Nastran, Adams, Actran, Marc, Digimat, and Simufact, through the MSC One token pool with INR invoicing. Our application engineers support EV-specific workflows: NVH simulation setup, battery pack structural analysis, vehicle dynamics modelling, and manufacturing simulation.

Engineering teams in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Delhi NCR, and Visakhapatnam can contact GSAS for EV simulation toolchain evaluation and deployment.

Explore Cadence Simulation Products → | Request a Quote →

Interested in Cadence tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Side by side vehicle outlines comparing a domain E/E architecture grouped by function against a zonal E/E architecture grouped by physical location, with zone controllers on an Ethernet backbone into central compute, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

Domain vs Zonal E/E Architectures Explained

Domain architectures group ECUs by function, zonal architectures group them by where they sit in the vehicle. This guide is the engineer's read on the difference: what physically moves, what the in-vehicle network has to become, and what happens to diagnostics, rest bus simulation and time sync. It also refuses to repeat the harness mass and ECU-count figures that circulate without a public source, and says exactly which claims are citable and which are not. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 13 min read
Left to right continuous integration pipeline from commit through build and a software-in-the-loop gate into a bench queue with a reservation gate, then a hardware-in-the-loop run and a report, showing the HIL bench as a shared queued resource, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

Test Automation for SDV: ASAM XIL, Virtual ECUs, CI for HIL

Every software-defined vehicle programme in India eventually asks the same question: why does a test case written for a laptop have to be rewritten for the virtual ECU and rewritten again for the bench? The two public anchors that answer it are the ASAM XIL API and the FMI packaged model format: FMI is a free standard, and ASAM publishes enough of XIL's structure openly that you can specify against it before anyone buys the document. This article walks the shift-left ladder honestly, including the four things that cannot move left, and treats the hardware-in-the-loop bench as a queued shared resource inside continuous integration rather than a desk someone books. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 13 min read
From Dedicated Analyzers to Multi-Protocol USB Adapters: A Bench Tool Evolution, featured image
Industry Insights Binho

From Dedicated Analyzers to Multi-Protocol USB Adapters: A Bench Tool Evolution

The embedded engineer's bench is consolidating, from drawers full of single-protocol tools to multi-protocol USB adapters that handle I2C, SPI, UART, RS-485 and I3C from a single device with one software environment. The driver is not hardware cost, it is the scripting environment that a shared instrument makes possible.

7 Apr 2026 · 5 min read