Skip to main content
Functional Testing of ECUs in India, ProMik SMART ICT Explained, featured image

Functional Testing of ECUs in India: ProMik SMART ICT Explained

GSAS Engineering · · 4 min read

Traditional in-circuit testing relies on physical probe access to individual nets on a circuit board. For decades, that approach worked, boards were large and test pads were plentiful. But modern ECU designs have moved in the opposite direction: components are smaller, boards are denser, and many ECUs ship encapsulated with no exposed test points. The traditional bed-of-nails fixture cannot reach what it needs to test.

ProMik’s SMART ICT (Intelligent Circuit Test) technology addresses this problem by reversing the direction of test access. Instead of probing the board from the outside in, SMART ICT tests it from the inside out, using the microcontroller already sitting on the board as the test instrument.

How SMART ICT Works

The concept is straightforward. SMART ICT downloads test software into the MCU through the programming interface, the same interface used during production flash programming. The MCU then executes test functions internally, exercising its own peripherals, measuring responses, and reporting results back through the programming interface.

This means the MCU itself becomes the test instrument. Every I/O pin, ADC channel, and communication interface that the MCU can access is also accessible to the SMART ICT test software, no bed of nails or test pads required. If the MCU can drive it or read it, SMART ICT can test it.

Peripheral and Controller Tests

SMART ICT divides its test capabilities into two categories: peripheral (external) tests and controller (internal) tests.

Peripheral tests exercise the devices and circuits connected to the MCU. These include testing peripheral devices via MCU I/Os and ADCs, interface tests across fieldbus and serial communication channels, memory tests covering Flash, RAM, and eMMC, sensor and actuator tests, and restbus simulation. Each of these tests uses the MCU’s own hardware peripherals to stimulate and measure the external circuit, the same way the circuit will operate in the field.

Controller tests focus on the MCU itself. These include MCU stress tests, interconnection tests (including for non-boundary-scan devices), built-in self-tests, and functional safety tests such as ECC error simulation. These internal tests verify that the MCU is operating correctly before it is trusted to test the surrounding circuitry.

Measurements and Additional Hardware

Beyond the MCU-driven tests, SMART ICT supports voltage level measurement and current consumption monitoring, including both run mode and sleep mode current profiles.

ProMik also provides a family of additional hardware modules that extend SMART ICT’s measurement capabilities beyond what the MCU alone can achieve:

  • Power Control Current Sensor (PCCS): precision current sensing for power rail monitoring
  • Galvanic Isolation Module: electrical isolation between test system and DUT
  • Power Sequencer Box: controlled power supply sequencing for multi-rail boards
  • Frequency Measurement Module: external frequency measurement
  • Level Shifter: voltage level translation for mixed-voltage designs
  • LIN Multiplexer: routing for LIN bus test channels
  • Watchdog Trigger: external watchdog management during test
  • PSU2048: a programmable power supply with four outputs, each delivering 4-50 V at up to 4 A (50 W per channel)
  • Fuse Charge Pump: controlled fuse programming

These modules connect to the ProMik MSP2300net programming and test platform, forming a complete production test cell.

Why Inside-Out Testing Delivers Higher Coverage

The coverage advantage of SMART ICT over traditional ICT follows directly from its architecture. A traditional ICT fixture can only test nets that have physical test points, and on a modern ECU with BGA packages, shielded modules, and potted assemblies, many nets have no accessible test point at all. SMART ICT bypasses this limitation entirely. If a peripheral is connected to the MCU, it is testable, regardless of physical board access.

This matters particularly for encapsulated ECUs and boards with limited physical access, exactly the designs that are becoming standard in automotive, industrial, and aerospace applications. Where a traditional ICT fixture might achieve partial coverage due to inaccessible nets, SMART ICT tests the same circuits through the MCU’s own peripheral connections.

Relevance for Indian ECU Manufacturing

As ECU production volumes grow across India, driven by automotive electronics localization, EV powertrain development, and industrial automation, production test strategies must keep pace with board complexity. SMART ICT offers a path forward for manufacturers in Bengaluru, Pune, Chennai, and other electronics hubs who are building increasingly complex boards that resist traditional ICT approaches.

GSAS is the authorized ProMik engineering partner in India, providing the MSP2300net platform, SMART ICT modules, and production integration support. Teams working with encapsulated ECU designs or high-density boards where traditional ICT coverage falls short can evaluate SMART ICT as a production-ready alternative.

Explore the ProMik MSP2300net | Contact GSAS for a demo

Interested in ProMik tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Master and slave roles on a 100BASE-T1 link: the master PHY times its transmitter from a local clock, the slave recovers the clock from the received signal, with the both-master and both-slave misconfigurations that leave the link down, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

100BASE-T1 Link Won't Come Up: A Vendor-Neutral Checklist

A 100BASE-T1 link that will not come up is almost never a mystery, but the answers on the web are written per silicon vendor and do not transfer. This is the ordered bring-up checklist that holds regardless of which PHY, switch or SoC you have: physical layer first, then the PHY over MDIO, then the master and slave pairing, then the causes of a link that comes up and drops. The standards and tooling claims trace to IEEE 802.3 task force records, the Linux ethtool and kernel documentation or published test material. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 14 min read
Side by side comparison of a 10BASE-T1S multidrop mixing segment, one balanced pair with four nodes on short stubs and a termination at each end, against a point to point star of four separate links into switch ports, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

10BASE-T1S and PLCA: Multidrop Ethernet Explained

10BASE-T1S is the one member of the T1 single-pair Ethernet family that keeps a shared medium, and PLCA is the reconciliation sublayer that stops the nodes on it from colliding. This article covers what IEEE 802.3cg standardises, how the beacon and transmit opportunities schedule a cycle, the node count and segment length figures the OPEN Alliance interoperability test suite works to, and the failure modes that put a segment quietly back into contention while every link still looks up. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India for teams bringing up multidrop segments on the bench.

29 Aug 2026 · 12 min read
Horizontal stacked bar showing where an ADAS test vehicle's bandwidth budget is spent, split into cameras, lidar, radar and bus traffic, with the logger uplink limit drawn as a vertical rule crossing the bar, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

ADAS Sensor Data Logging: Bandwidth Budgets That Add Up

Every page that tells you an ADAS test vehicle produces terabytes a day states the headline and skips the arithmetic, so you cannot redo it for your own sensor set. This article publishes the arithmetic instead: one formula, every table row derived on the page, a worked eight-hour drive that chains those rows into a sustained write rate, a media count and an offload window, and the five places bandwidth budgets go wrong. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 15 min read