Skip to main content
EV battery pack under test with regenerative bidirectional DC source-and-sink

Regenerative DC Power Testing for EV Battery Validation in India

GSAS Engineering · · 5 min read

Why the Workload Is Changing

India’s EV programmes, two-wheeler OEMs, automotive Tier-1 suppliers, battery pack assemblers, and the cell-to-pack manufacturers ramping in Bengaluru, Pune, Chennai, and Hyderabad, are scaling validation capacity alongside production capacity. At the centre of that validation lab sits a DC source-and-sink: the instrument that drives charge cycles into a battery pack and absorbs the discharge energy back out again, with the BMS and DC-DC converter under instrumentation throughout.

Traditional dissipative loads dump every absorbed watt into heat. For continuous battery cycling at the kilowatt-to-tens-of-kilowatts range that EV qualification requires, that translates into a meaningful electricity and HVAC line item, energy spent producing nothing except heat that the facility then pays again to remove.

Regenerative bidirectional platforms address both sides of that problem.

How a Regenerative Bidirectional Source-and-Sink Works

The architecture combines two functions in one chassis:

  • A programmable DC source drives the DUT during charge cycles, fault simulation, or steady-state validation.
  • A regenerative sink absorbs power during discharge cycles, converts the absorbed DC back to AC synchronised with the facility’s mains, and feeds it into the local electrical grid for use by other loads on the same distribution.

The transition between source and sink modes happens within the same instrument with no rewiring. For battery testing, the BMS sees a single DC bus that ramps positive and negative current as the test profile demands. For DC-DC converter testing, the source-and-sink covers both forward and reverse power paths required by bidirectional traction-drive converters.

Energy recovery is a function of the regenerative inverter stage’s efficiency. The exact recovered fraction depends on operating point and is published per platform, the architectural takeaway is that the heat dissipated and the net grid draw are both substantially smaller than for a dissipative load operating at the same power.

The GW Instek RBS Series

GW Instek’s regenerative bidirectional platform for this workload is the RBS Series. Key parameters:

CapabilitySpecification
Power per unit5 / 10 / 15 kW (3U chassis)
Voltage models100 V, 500 V, 750 V, 1000 V, 1500 V, 2250 V
Max currentUp to 510 A
OperationBidirectional source + regenerative sink
Battery models8 chemistries (LMO, LCO, LFP, NCM, LTO, Pb, NiMH, NiCd) + 1 user-defined
PV simulationEN50530, Sandia, SAS2, user-defined
MPPT testingStatic and dynamic, with cloud-shading / cloud-movement profiles

The voltage lineup spans the practical range of EV pack voltages, 100 V is appropriate for two-wheeler and three-wheeler packs; 500–1000 V covers passenger-vehicle and commercial-vehicle packs; 1500–2250 V reaches into utility-scale energy-storage qualification and high-voltage DC bus testing.

Indian EV Validation Workloads

Battery pack cycling. AIS 156 (electric power-train safety requirements) and AIS 038 (rechargeable energy storage system requirements) call for extensive charge-discharge cycling under controlled conditions. The RBS’s bidirectional behaviour runs both sides of the cycle from one instrument; the regenerative path makes 24/7 cycle work practical to operate and to fund.

BMS validation. Battery management systems need to be exercised against fault scenarios, cell overvoltage, undervoltage, overcurrent, temperature excursion, communication failure. The built-in chemistry models simulate the electrical behaviour of a real pack under each scenario, including charge and discharge transitions, without a physical pack on the bench.

DC-DC converter testing. EV powertrains use multiple DC-DC stages, high-voltage to 48 V auxiliary, 48 V to 12 V, and bidirectional converters that handle regenerative braking energy. Each stage must be validated at full power across its operating envelope. Bidirectional source-and-sink behaviour exercises both the forward path and the reverse path in one test setup.

Motor-drive and inverter testing. While the mechanical side of motor characterisation goes to a dynamometer, the DC bus side of an inverter still requires a controllable DC source-and-sink for hardware-in-the-loop and steady-state qualification. A regenerative platform on the DC bus absorbs the simulated regenerative-braking energy without dumping it as heat.

Solar inverter validation. The same chassis with EN50530 and Sandia profiles loaded covers MPPT verification for the solar-inverter side of the lab, useful for groups that span solar and EV charging infrastructure validation.

Thermal and Infrastructure Implications

Beyond the direct energy bill, regenerative loading reduces the cooling infrastructure each test station requires. A multi-kW dissipative load deposits its full rated power as heat into the test area; the equivalent regenerative platform deposits only the conversion losses. For Indian facilities running through summers where ambient routinely exceeds 35 °C, that translates directly into smaller HVAC capital expenditure and lower air-conditioning operating cost.

Rack density also improves. Dissipative loads are dominated by heatsinks and fans; regenerative platforms move the energy out through the AC cable, which lets them pack more tightly in a rack.

Buying GW Instek Regenerative Test Equipment in India

GSAS Micro Systems is an authorized partner in India. Application engineers in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Delhi NCR, and Visakhapatnam work on power-electronics test infrastructure, including instrument selection, rack integration, and SCPI-based test automation for EV battery and converter validation labs.

Explore GW Instek power testing solutions → · Request a quote → · Book a demo →

Interested in GW Instek tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Master and slave roles on a 100BASE-T1 link: the master PHY times its transmitter from a local clock, the slave recovers the clock from the received signal, with the both-master and both-slave misconfigurations that leave the link down, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

100BASE-T1 Link Won't Come Up: A Vendor-Neutral Checklist

A 100BASE-T1 link that will not come up is almost never a mystery, but the answers on the web are written per silicon vendor and do not transfer. This is the ordered bring-up checklist that holds regardless of which PHY, switch or SoC you have: physical layer first, then the PHY over MDIO, then the master and slave pairing, then the causes of a link that comes up and drops. The standards and tooling claims trace to IEEE 802.3 task force records, the Linux ethtool and kernel documentation or published test material. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 14 min read
Side by side comparison of a 10BASE-T1S multidrop mixing segment, one balanced pair with four nodes on short stubs and a termination at each end, against a point to point star of four separate links into switch ports, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

10BASE-T1S and PLCA: Multidrop Ethernet Explained

10BASE-T1S is the one member of the T1 single-pair Ethernet family that keeps a shared medium, and PLCA is the reconciliation sublayer that stops the nodes on it from colliding. This article covers what IEEE 802.3cg standardises, how the beacon and transmit opportunities schedule a cycle, the node count and segment length figures the OPEN Alliance interoperability test suite works to, and the failure modes that put a segment quietly back into contention while every link still looks up. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India for teams bringing up multidrop segments on the bench.

29 Aug 2026 · 12 min read
Horizontal stacked bar showing where an ADAS test vehicle's bandwidth budget is spent, split into cameras, lidar, radar and bus traffic, with the logger uplink limit drawn as a vertical rule crossing the bar, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

ADAS Sensor Data Logging: Bandwidth Budgets That Add Up

Every page that tells you an ADAS test vehicle produces terabytes a day states the headline and skips the arithmetic, so you cannot redo it for your own sensor set. This article publishes the arithmetic instead: one formula, every table row derived on the page, a worked eight-hour drive that chains those rows into a sustained write rate, a media count and an offload window, and the five places bandwidth budgets go wrong. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 15 min read