Skip to main content
EV battery pack under test with regenerative bidirectional DC source-and-sink

Regenerative DC Power Testing for EV Battery Validation in India

GSAS Engineering · · 5 min read

Why the Workload Is Changing

India’s EV programmes, two-wheeler OEMs, automotive Tier-1 suppliers, battery pack assemblers, and the cell-to-pack manufacturers ramping in Bengaluru, Pune, Chennai, and Hyderabad, are scaling validation capacity alongside production capacity. At the centre of that validation lab sits a DC source-and-sink: the instrument that drives charge cycles into a battery pack and absorbs the discharge energy back out again, with the BMS and DC-DC converter under instrumentation throughout.

Traditional dissipative loads dump every absorbed watt into heat. For continuous battery cycling at the kilowatt-to-tens-of-kilowatts range that EV qualification requires, that translates into a meaningful electricity and HVAC line item, energy spent producing nothing except heat that the facility then pays again to remove.

Regenerative bidirectional platforms address both sides of that problem.

How a Regenerative Bidirectional Source-and-Sink Works

The architecture combines two functions in one chassis:

  • A programmable DC source drives the DUT during charge cycles, fault simulation, or steady-state validation.
  • A regenerative sink absorbs power during discharge cycles, converts the absorbed DC back to AC synchronised with the facility’s mains, and feeds it into the local electrical grid for use by other loads on the same distribution.

The transition between source and sink modes happens within the same instrument with no rewiring. For battery testing, the BMS sees a single DC bus that ramps positive and negative current as the test profile demands. For DC-DC converter testing, the source-and-sink covers both forward and reverse power paths required by bidirectional traction-drive converters.

Energy recovery is a function of the regenerative inverter stage’s efficiency. The exact recovered fraction depends on operating point and is published per platform, the architectural takeaway is that the heat dissipated and the net grid draw are both substantially smaller than for a dissipative load operating at the same power.

The GW Instek RBS Series

GW Instek’s regenerative bidirectional platform for this workload is the RBS Series. Key parameters:

CapabilitySpecification
Power per unit5 / 10 / 15 kW (3U chassis)
Voltage models100 V, 500 V, 750 V, 1000 V, 1500 V, 2250 V
Max currentUp to 510 A
OperationBidirectional source + regenerative sink
Battery models8 chemistries (LMO, LCO, LFP, NCM, LTO, Pb, NiMH, NiCd) + 1 user-defined
PV simulationEN50530, Sandia, SAS2, user-defined
MPPT testingStatic and dynamic, with cloud-shading / cloud-movement profiles

The voltage lineup spans the practical range of EV pack voltages, 100 V is appropriate for two-wheeler and three-wheeler packs; 500–1000 V covers passenger-vehicle and commercial-vehicle packs; 1500–2250 V reaches into utility-scale energy-storage qualification and high-voltage DC bus testing.

Indian EV Validation Workloads

Battery pack cycling. AIS 156 (electric power-train safety requirements) and AIS 038 (rechargeable energy storage system requirements) call for extensive charge-discharge cycling under controlled conditions. The RBS’s bidirectional behaviour runs both sides of the cycle from one instrument; the regenerative path makes 24/7 cycle work practical to operate and to fund.

BMS validation. Battery management systems need to be exercised against fault scenarios, cell overvoltage, undervoltage, overcurrent, temperature excursion, communication failure. The built-in chemistry models simulate the electrical behaviour of a real pack under each scenario, including charge and discharge transitions, without a physical pack on the bench.

DC-DC converter testing. EV powertrains use multiple DC-DC stages, high-voltage to 48 V auxiliary, 48 V to 12 V, and bidirectional converters that handle regenerative braking energy. Each stage must be validated at full power across its operating envelope. Bidirectional source-and-sink behaviour exercises both the forward path and the reverse path in one test setup.

Motor-drive and inverter testing. While the mechanical side of motor characterisation goes to a dynamometer, the DC bus side of an inverter still requires a controllable DC source-and-sink for hardware-in-the-loop and steady-state qualification. A regenerative platform on the DC bus absorbs the simulated regenerative-braking energy without dumping it as heat.

Solar inverter validation. The same chassis with EN50530 and Sandia profiles loaded covers MPPT verification for the solar-inverter side of the lab, useful for groups that span solar and EV charging infrastructure validation.

Thermal and Infrastructure Implications

Beyond the direct energy bill, regenerative loading reduces the cooling infrastructure each test station requires. A multi-kW dissipative load deposits its full rated power as heat into the test area; the equivalent regenerative platform deposits only the conversion losses. For Indian facilities running through summers where ambient routinely exceeds 35 °C, that translates directly into smaller HVAC capital expenditure and lower air-conditioning operating cost.

Rack density also improves. Dissipative loads are dominated by heatsinks and fans; regenerative platforms move the energy out through the AC cable, which lets them pack more tightly in a rack.

Buying GW Instek Regenerative Test Equipment in India

GSAS Micro Systems is an authorized partner in India. Application engineers in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Delhi NCR, and Visakhapatnam work on power-electronics test infrastructure, including instrument selection, rack integration, and SCPI-based test automation for EV battery and converter validation labs.

Explore GW Instek power testing solutions → · Request a quote → · Book a demo →

Interested in GW Instek tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

FPGA in the loop verification workflow between Simulink and a Zynq-7000 development board
Technical Guides Digilent

ZedBoard FPGA-in-the-Loop: HDL Verifier vs HDL Coder

Teams asking for FPGA-in-the-Loop on a ZedBoard usually name HDL Coder and SoC Blockset. FIL is actually HDL Verifier. Here is the correct product split, the JTAG versus Ethernet decision, and the 2015-era advice that is still sending Indian teams down the wrong path.

5 Aug 2026 · 9 min read
FADOS MUX test station on an Indian EMS line generating a board test report, GSAS FADOS reporting workflow
FADOS CBT Electronic

FADOS Test Reports and GSAS Agent: Turning Board Test Results into an Auditable Record

A pass or fail on the FADOS screen is not a record. This guide covers what the FADOS test report contains, what GSAS Agent does with it, and how offline, Google Drive and LAN modes put a QR-linked report on the job card for repair shops and EMS lines in India.

4 Aug 2026 · 8 min read
Classification tree and combination table used to design embedded unit test cases in Razorcat's Classification Tree Editor for TESSY, available in India from GSAS Micro Systems
Compliance & Safety Razorcat Automotive & Mobility

Test Case Design with the Classification Tree Method: Deriving Unit Tests You Can Defend in an Audit

Ad-hoc test cases can be perfectly good tests and still fail an audit, because nothing on file records why that particular set was sufficient. The Classification Tree Method derives test cases from the input space instead: identify the test-relevant aspects as classifications, partition each into equivalence classes, then combine leaf classes in a combination table. Razorcat implements CTM in the Classification Tree Editor, available integrated into TESSY or standalone. GSAS Micro Systems is the authorized Razorcat engineering partner for India, the UAE and Sri Lanka.

1 Aug 2026 · 10 min read