Skip to main content
EV battery pack under test with regenerative bidirectional DC source-and-sink

Regenerative DC Power Testing for EV Battery Validation in India

GSAS Engineering · · 5 min read

Why the Workload Is Changing

India’s EV programmes, two-wheeler OEMs, automotive Tier-1 suppliers, battery pack assemblers, and the cell-to-pack manufacturers ramping in Bengaluru, Pune, Chennai, and Hyderabad, are scaling validation capacity alongside production capacity. At the centre of that validation lab sits a DC source-and-sink: the instrument that drives charge cycles into a battery pack and absorbs the discharge energy back out again, with the BMS and DC-DC converter under instrumentation throughout.

Traditional dissipative loads dump every absorbed watt into heat. For continuous battery cycling at the kilowatt-to-tens-of-kilowatts range that EV qualification requires, that translates into a meaningful electricity and HVAC line item, energy spent producing nothing except heat that the facility then pays again to remove.

Regenerative bidirectional platforms address both sides of that problem.

How a Regenerative Bidirectional Source-and-Sink Works

The architecture combines two functions in one chassis:

  • A programmable DC source drives the DUT during charge cycles, fault simulation, or steady-state validation.
  • A regenerative sink absorbs power during discharge cycles, converts the absorbed DC back to AC synchronised with the facility’s mains, and feeds it into the local electrical grid for use by other loads on the same distribution.

The transition between source and sink modes happens within the same instrument with no rewiring. For battery testing, the BMS sees a single DC bus that ramps positive and negative current as the test profile demands. For DC-DC converter testing, the source-and-sink covers both forward and reverse power paths required by bidirectional traction-drive converters.

Energy recovery is a function of the regenerative inverter stage’s efficiency. The exact recovered fraction depends on operating point and is published per platform, the architectural takeaway is that the heat dissipated and the net grid draw are both substantially smaller than for a dissipative load operating at the same power.

The GW Instek RBS Series

GW Instek’s regenerative bidirectional platform for this workload is the RBS Series. Key parameters:

CapabilitySpecification
Power per unit5 to 30 kW (3U chassis)
Voltage models100 V, 500 V, 750 V, 1000 V, 1500 V, 2250 V
Max currentUp to 510 A
OperationBidirectional source + regenerative sink
Battery models8 chemistries (LMO, LCO, LFP, NCM, LTO, Pb, NiMH, NiCd) + 1 user-defined
PV simulationPV SAS, EN50530, Sandia, SAS2, user-defined
MPPT testingStatic and dynamic, with cloud-shading / cloud-movement profiles

The voltage lineup spans the practical range of EV pack voltages, 100 V is appropriate for two-wheeler and three-wheeler packs; 500–1000 V covers passenger-vehicle and commercial-vehicle packs; 1500–2250 V reaches into utility-scale energy-storage qualification and high-voltage DC bus testing.

Indian EV Validation Workloads

Battery pack cycling. AIS 156 (electric power-train safety requirements) and AIS 038 (rechargeable energy storage system requirements) call for extensive charge-discharge cycling under controlled conditions. The RBS’s bidirectional behaviour runs both sides of the cycle from one instrument; the regenerative path makes 24/7 cycle work practical to operate and to fund.

BMS validation. Battery management systems need to be exercised against fault scenarios, cell overvoltage, undervoltage, overcurrent, temperature excursion, communication failure. The built-in chemistry models simulate the electrical behaviour of a real pack under each scenario, including charge and discharge transitions, without a physical pack on the bench.

DC-DC converter testing. EV powertrains use multiple DC-DC stages, high-voltage to 48 V auxiliary, 48 V to 12 V, and bidirectional converters that handle regenerative braking energy. Each stage must be validated at full power across its operating envelope. Bidirectional source-and-sink behaviour exercises both the forward path and the reverse path in one test setup.

Motor-drive and inverter testing. While the mechanical side of motor characterisation goes to a dynamometer, the DC bus side of an inverter still requires a controllable DC source-and-sink for hardware-in-the-loop and steady-state qualification. A regenerative platform on the DC bus absorbs the simulated regenerative-braking energy without dumping it as heat.

Solar inverter validation. The same chassis with EN50530 and Sandia profiles loaded covers MPPT verification for the solar-inverter side of the lab, useful for groups that span solar and EV charging infrastructure validation.

Thermal and Infrastructure Implications

Beyond the direct energy bill, regenerative loading reduces the cooling infrastructure each test station requires. A multi-kW dissipative load deposits its full rated power as heat into the test area; the equivalent regenerative platform deposits only the conversion losses. For Indian facilities running through summers where ambient routinely exceeds 35 °C, that translates directly into smaller HVAC capital expenditure and lower air-conditioning operating cost.

Rack density also improves. Dissipative loads are dominated by heatsinks and fans; regenerative platforms move the energy out through the AC cable, which lets them pack more tightly in a rack.

Buying GW Instek Regenerative Test Equipment in India

GSAS Micro Systems is an authorized partner in India. Application engineers in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Delhi NCR, and Visakhapatnam work on power-electronics test infrastructure, including instrument selection, rack integration, and SCPI-based test automation for EV battery and converter validation labs.

Explore GW Instek power testing solutions → · Request a quote → · Book a demo →

Interested in GW Instek tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Embedded engineering bench in India, illustrating the hardware a developer can act on today, supported by GSAS
Technical Guides Arm

Arm's Agentic AI Push: What Indian Embedded Teams Can Actually Use Today

Arm has set out its platform strategy for the agentic era, putting inference everywhere it has compute. Indian embedded teams can start on that direction this quarter with the Cortex-M toolchain they already own: Helium, CMSIS-NN, Ethos-U and Vela, on boards you can order today.

13 Sept 2026 · 7 min read
The bench to harness adapter path drawn left to right: the ECU connector, a test lead, a media converter or pluggable T1 module, RJ45, and the host, showing where each connector family sits between the device under test and the laptop, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

Automotive Ethernet Connectors: H-MTD, MATEnet, MQS

An ECU arrives on the bench with a connector nobody has a mate for, and the day is gone. Search the family names and you get connector product pages that describe their own part and stop there. This article puts the families side by side in one table using only what their public pages state, then makes the point those pages leave out: the IEEE link segment definition, not the connector, is what sets reach and loss limits, and shielding is a channel decision rather than a preference. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 12 min read
Split panel diagram comparing one control message on a shared multidrop CAN bus with one sensor stream on a switched point to point Ethernet link, labelled shared bus arbitration, node, point to point link, switch, control message and sensor stream, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

CAN vs Automotive Ethernet: When to Use Each

CAN and automotive Ethernet answer different questions, so the useful comparison is a decision table rather than a winner. This guide from GSAS Micro Systems sets CAN and CAN FD figures from CAN in Automation next to the IEEE 802.3bw objectives for 100BASE-T1, covers arbitration against switch queues, cost and harness consequences, failure modes on both sides, and what changes on an India bench team's setup when a project adds Ethernet next to the CAN it already runs.

29 Aug 2026 · 14 min read