Skip to main content
ProMik Boundary Scan Suite interface showing automated PCB interconnect test results

Boundary Scan Testing for PCB Assembly: ProMik Boundary Scan Suite

GSAS Engineering · · 4 min read

Production boards are getting smaller, ECUs ship fully encapsulated, and test points disappear from layouts. When physical probe access shrinks, boundary scan becomes the primary method for verifying solder joints and interconnections at scale. ProMik’s Boundary Scan Suite brings this capability to production lines with fully automated test generation, no expert knowledge required.

What Is Boundary Scan Testing?

Boundary scan, defined by IEEE 1149.1, is a digital test method that verifies circuit boards and ICs without physical probes. Every boundary-scan-compliant IC contains a test access port (TAP) and boundary scan cells along its I/O pins. Through a standard JTAG interface, a test system can drive signals onto board traces and read them back, detecting shorts, opens, soldering issues, and interconnect faults, all digitally.

Two core tests make up the boundary scan workflow. Infrastructure test verifies the JTAG chain itself: are all boundary-scan-capable devices connected, powered, and responding correctly? Interconnect test goes further, checking the physical connections between devices on the board, confirming that nets are intact and that no unintended shorts exist.

How ProMik’s Boundary Scan Suite Works

ProMik’s approach eliminates the traditional barrier to boundary scan adoption: test development complexity.

The suite generates tests fully automatically from three standard inputs:

  • ODB++: the board layout data, describing every net, pad, and component placement
  • BSDL: Boundary Scan Description Language files for each IEEE 1149.1 device, describing its TAP and cell structure
  • BOM: the bill of materials, identifying which components are populated

From these three inputs, the Boundary Scan Suite produces a complete test program covering infrastructure test and interconnect test. No manual test vector writing. No scripting. The GUI-based test development environment is designed so that production engineers can create and maintain tests without specialized boundary scan expertise.

Key Features

  • Blacklisting: exclude specific nets or devices from testing when needed (e.g., unpopulated variants, known exceptions)
  • Coverage reporting: see exactly which nets and connections are tested, and which fall outside boundary scan coverage
  • Detailed error reporting: when a test fails, the system identifies the specific fault type and location (short, open, or soldering defect)
  • No debug interface required: test encapsulated or boxed ECUs where debug connectors are inaccessible

Where Boundary Scan Fits Best

Boundary scan testing is particularly valuable in scenarios where traditional in-circuit test (ICT) cannot reach:

  • Miniaturized designs with fine-pitch BGAs and limited test pad access
  • Encapsulated ECUs where the board is sealed inside a housing before test
  • Boards with limited physical access due to component density or mechanical constraints

For automotive electronics production in India, where ECU complexity is increasing rapidly with ADAS, EV, and domain controller programs, boundary scan provides a scalable quality gate that does not depend on physical probe fixtures.

Integration Options

ProMik offers the Boundary Scan Suite in two forms:

  • FlashTask Pro: ProMik’s production-grade flash programming platform, which integrates boundary scan testing alongside programming. Same hardware, same interface, same software, same workflow. A single station handles both programming and board-level test.
  • DLL for sequencer integration: for production lines already using test sequencers like LabVIEW or TestStand, ProMik provides a DLL that integrates boundary scan into existing test sequences.

The MSP2300net flash programming system supports this combined workflow, enabling production teams to consolidate programming and test onto one platform.

Why Buy ProMik Boundary Scan Tools from GSAS India

GSAS Micro Systems is the authorized engineering partner in India. Our team in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune provides pre-sales evaluation support, integration assistance, and after-sales service for ProMik’s full product range, including the Boundary Scan Suite, FlashTask Pro, and all flash programming hardware.

If your production line tests miniaturized boards, encapsulated ECUs, or high-density assemblies, boundary scan belongs in your test strategy. Contact GSAS to discuss your requirements or schedule a demonstration.

Interested in ProMik tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

FPGA in the loop verification workflow between Simulink and a Zynq-7000 development board
Technical Guides Digilent

ZedBoard FPGA-in-the-Loop: HDL Verifier vs HDL Coder

Teams asking for FPGA-in-the-Loop on a ZedBoard usually name HDL Coder and SoC Blockset. FIL is actually HDL Verifier. Here is the correct product split, the JTAG versus Ethernet decision, and the 2015-era advice that is still sending Indian teams down the wrong path.

5 Aug 2026 · 9 min read
FADOS MUX test station on an Indian EMS line generating a board test report, GSAS FADOS reporting workflow
FADOS CBT Electronic

FADOS Test Reports and GSAS Agent: Turning Board Test Results into an Auditable Record

A pass or fail on the FADOS screen is not a record. This guide covers what the FADOS test report contains, what GSAS Agent does with it, and how offline, Google Drive and LAN modes put a QR-linked report on the job card for repair shops and EMS lines in India.

4 Aug 2026 · 8 min read
Classification tree and combination table used to design embedded unit test cases in Razorcat's Classification Tree Editor for TESSY, available in India from GSAS Micro Systems
Compliance & Safety Razorcat Automotive & Mobility

Test Case Design with the Classification Tree Method: Deriving Unit Tests You Can Defend in an Audit

Ad-hoc test cases can be perfectly good tests and still fail an audit, because nothing on file records why that particular set was sufficient. The Classification Tree Method derives test cases from the input space instead: identify the test-relevant aspects as classifications, partition each into equivalence classes, then combine leaf classes in a combination table. Razorcat implements CTM in the Classification Tree Editor, available integrated into TESSY or standalone. GSAS Micro Systems is the authorized Razorcat engineering partner for India, the UAE and Sri Lanka.

1 Aug 2026 · 10 min read