Skip to main content
Altium Designer unified PCB design environment showing schematic-to-layout-to-3D workflow on a multi-board complex system design
Technical Guides

Altium Designer: 6 Reasons to Switch Design Tools

GSAS Engineering · · 1 min read

ALTIUM DESIGNER®: 6 REASONS TO SWITCH DESIGN TOOLS

With Altium Designer, no design is out of your reach! Whether you’re designing a single PCB or a complex system with multiple circuit boards. Altium Designer’s powerful single application provides you with a no-compromise experience for every step of your design journey.

Join us for a live webinar to take a peek at Altium’s PCB design solution. See for yourself why PCB Designers are switching to Altium Designer.

Timing

Thursday, 13th August 2020 | 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM

THIS DEMO WILL SHOWCASE THE FOLLOWING:
    • How Templates, Design Reuse, and our Unified Design environment can help you create new designs fast.
    • How new panels can support your search and decision for components.
    • How easy it is to speed up your design process with interactive routing and powerful ECAD/MCAD 3D features.
    • Why integrated functions for creating parts lists, documentation, and output data can save you time every day.

REGISTER NOW

LEARN MORE ABOUT ALTIUM DESIGNER

Six reasons Indian teams move from Altium to Siemens Xpedition

The “switch to Altium” framing is one half of the conversation. The other half, Indian teams that started on Altium and moved to Siemens Xpedition as their boards and engineering organisations grew, comes up just as often in GSAS’s pre-sales conversations. The recurring drivers:

  1. Multi-board systems: when a programme spans 3+ boards interconnected via rigid-flex, backplane, or harness, the single-design-database model in Xpedition Enterprise becomes the productivity unlock.
  2. HyperLynx SI/PI sign-off: high-speed designs (DDR4/5, PCIe Gen4+, 28G+ SerDes) need pre-layout topology exploration, post-layout post-route verification, and channel simulation. The native HyperLynx integration in Xpedition is tighter than any third-party SI plug-in into Altium.
  3. Valor NPI cloud DFM: Xpedition Standard ships with 12 cloud DFM runs/year against fabricator-specific process rules, catching manufacturability issues before fab release. Indian fabricators participate in the Valor ecosystem.
  4. Geographically distributed teams: Xpedition’s design-database model handles multiple designers working concurrently on the same database from Bengaluru / Hyderabad / Chennai / Pune offices, with check-in/check-out semantics built in.
  5. Token-based licensing: pay only for the advanced capability used (rigid-flex, SI add-ons, advanced packaging) rather than buying a flagship-tier seat for every designer.
  6. Advanced packaging via Xpedition Package Designer: for teams crossing into 2.5D/3D IC, SiP, or chiplet substrate work, Xpedition has a coherent packaging flow Altium does not address.

GSAS Micro Systems is an authorized engineering partner in India. For the canonical comparison, see Altium Designer vs Siemens Xpedition Standard for Indian PCB teams.

Compare with Xpedition Standard → | Talk to GSAS about a migration evaluation

Also appears in:

Technical Guides

Need embedded development tools?

Talk to our application engineers for personalized tool recommendations.

Request a Quote Ask an engineer a question →
← Back to Blog Discuss This Topic With Us

You might also like

View all →
Thermal validation bench diagram: a programmable DC source in constant-power mode driving a CPU thermal simulator inside a wind tunnel, with temperature logging, India, GSAS Micro Systems

Emulating Processor Power for Thermal Testing: Why Constant Power

7 Oct · 7 min

CRPS server power supply test bench diagram: GW Instek ASR-6000 feeding a rack power shelf three-phase or single-phase CRPS modules one phase each, with an electronic load and host automation, India, GSAS Micro Systems

CRPS and Rack Power Supply Testing: The Six Tests That Matter

7 Oct · 7 min

GPU power board test bench diagram: a programmable DC source feeding a GPU power delivery board, with input current, conversion and protection monitoring, India, GSAS Micro Systems

GPU Power Board Testing: DC Input Verification Before Integration

7 Oct · 6 min

Stay in the Loop

Get monthly compliance updates, product insights, and engineering best practices delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

Embedded engineering workstation in India, illustrating the debug, analysis and design steps where AI now runs inside the process, supported by GSAS
Industry Insights

AI Inside the Engineering Process: What Is Worth Automating, and What Still Needs an Engineer

Arm, SEGGER, Perforce and Siemens EDA have each put AI inside a step of the engineering process rather than on top of it: debug, remediation, design entry, inference on the part. GSAS sets out the position behind our coverage of each: which steps are now worth automating, and which keep a human because the cost of being wrong is a recall.

21 Sept 2026 · 11 min read
Embedded development bench, illustrating the hardware debug loop an AI agent can now drive, supported in India by GSAS
J-Link SEGGER

An AI Agent That Drives the Debugger: SEGGER and Embedder Connect J-Link to the Loop

SEGGER has given an AI coding agent direct control of J-Link and J-Trace: flash, breakpoints, memory inspection and live RTT on real silicon. The loop only works if the probe can read target RAM while the core runs, and GSAS field engineers know exactly where that breaks first.

13 Sept 2026 · 6 min read
Storage sizing ladder for automotive data logging: four rungs stepping from an aggregate link rate of 1 Gbit/s to 125 MB per second, then 450 GB per hour, then 3.6 TB per eight-hour shift, then 18 TB per five-day week, in decimal units, from GSAS Micro Systems India
Automotive Ethernet Automotive & Mobility

Automotive Data Loggers: Capture Without Loss

Search for an automotive data logger and the results split into cheap OBD dongles at one end and enterprise ADAS recorders at the other, with nothing in between explaining the engineering that decides whether you lose frames. This is the loss budget end to end: mirror oversubscription upstream of the logger, encapsulation overhead on the capture path, sustained write rate against burst rate, rotation stalls, and storage arithmetic worked in full so you can redo it with your own numbers instead of trusting ours. Written by the GSAS Micro Systems engineering team in India.

29 Aug 2026 · 13 min read